PLEEEEZE POST and PASS IT ON

April 9, 2025

James Bell—Presente!

April 6, 2025

It’s so sad to say goodbye to this giant, James Bell.

He’s gone. And, at the same time, it feels like he is with us still.

Time is a destroyer to be sure, but time is also a witness, and the evidence of James is generous and immense.

He asked me to write a review of his book, and below is what I sent him long ago.

💥🔥💥Bill

Sorrow’s Kitchen will change the way we think about the criminal legal system and justice, about policing and public safety, and about prisons and prison reform. James Bell offers a unique approach to what are made to seem like intractable problems, and he begins by going to the root and asking us to unleash our most radical imaginations. Why are things the way they are? Where do we come from? What are we, and what can we become? Bell understands and embraces Emily Dickinson’s image of the imagination as a force that can ignite the “slow fuse of possibility,” cracking and sparkling toward what could be or should be, but is not yet.

James Bell’s odyssey through the criminal legal system as a lawyer, an organizer, an activist, and a public intellectual has given him some hard-earned wisdom and the tools to challenge the myths that prop up the whole enterprise. It also makes him a perfect messenger. He argues that, more than a system, what we must confront is an ideology and a dogma, more difficult to identify and harder to unearth. In his effort to challenge the conventional doctrine, Bell foregrounds the arts of liberty—imagination to be sure, but also creativity, initiative, courage, and risk-taking.

James Baldwin once said that the “American Negro has the great advantage of having never believed the collection of myths to which white Americans cling: that their ancestors were all freedom-loving heroes, that they were born in the greatest country the world has ever seen…[Our] tendency has really been…to dismiss white people as the slightly mad victims of their own brainwashing.” James Bell writes in the great tradition of the myth-breakers.

Just as slavery was a defining fact of American life from the Seventeenth to the Nineteenth Centuries, racialized captivity is a central feature in the US today. And just as the abolition of slavery was unimaginable to most Americans then, a society without a bloated prison bureaucracy is difficult for people to wrap their heads around now. But when enough of us become liberated from the dogma of incarceration and the totalizing logic of captivity and control, we might mobilize ourselves to make the radical changes that Bell proposes. We may look back—just as we look back at slavery—with astonishment and anguish as we realize that the prison-industrial complex was a bad choice: it vitalized white supremacy, ruined millions of human lives, devastated social capital, destroyed whole communities, and diminished our society. Slavery made cruelty customary and unkindness conventional, everyone forced to witness and embrace it as such, or to shut their eyes tight as communities were made more hard-hearted and hateful. Just as the abolition of slavery liberated enormous energy toward a more generous and compassionate social order, realizing James Bell’s vision will create the conditions for a more just and decent community for all.

Sorrow’s Kitchen is a generous invitation to join the movement, and it offers a practical on-ramp to get busy in projects of repair. This book is for anyone who is struggling to understand the overlapping crises that characterize our world today, and will, I believe, have an explosive impact.

~~William Ayers


Episode 121—please repost

April 2, 2025

Alma Mater

March 31, 2025

The University of Michigan, which had one of the best Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs in the country, has decided to eliminate it. The head of the faculty senate accused the administration of trying to “engineer a sweeping culture change towards white supremacy,” adding “University of Michigan leaders seem determined to comply and to collaborate in our own destruction.”


Vichy on the Hudson: the collapse of Columbia U

March 28, 2025

Michael Boudin…r.i.p.

March 27, 2025

Amos Kennedy at PCB!

March 22, 2025

Jimmy Soto on Under the Tree

March 20, 2025

WE NEED MORE FLASH DANCING!!

March 14, 2025

Defend Mahmoud Khalil

March 12, 2025

[As news broke last Friday of the Trump administration’s plan to revoke $400 million dollars of research funding to Columbia University, filmmaker and Columbia professor James Schamus posted the following to a faculty list serve there. It has been lightly edited for publication here.]

Allow me to address a few words to my fellow Jewish faculty members:

So the white nationalist hammer is coming down on Columbia University, which is being made an example of, in order to scare all institutions of higher education into falling in line with the Musk/Trump plan to destroy any and all potential civil society nodes of resistance to the authoritarian regime they are putting in place. Don’t be fooled: the excuse they are using to destroy the institution—that Columbia is incorrigibly antisemitic—is, of course, the exact opposite of what is happening. They are coming after Columbia precisely because the University is, to the (not-) “populist” base in front of whom they perform their Hitler salutes and at whom they hose their antisemitic memes, an emblem precisely of Jewishness: it’s “globalist,” “cosmopolitan,” New York-based, “liberal,” etc.

Of course the nationalists coming after us are also pro-Israel—they love the idea that there is an ethnonationalist garrison state to which all Jews should send themselves, and which will most likely self-destruct anyway in a cataclysmic orgy of Armageddon-like violence. And the Netanyahu-aligned establishment Jewish [sic] organizations, such as the ADL, who today are cheering on the destruction of Columbia, are more than happy to make common cause with their fellow nationalists—so long as the billions and billions of dollars’ worth of bombs keep flowing Israel’s way.

Columbia administrators have been relentlessly cracking down on campus speech and protest around Israel’s ongoing depredations in Gaza and elsewhere, in a combination of pro-Israel zeal and “practical” calculations that such appeasement might shield the institution from the worst of what’s coming. But of course their abject compliance has done nothing of the sort. And colleagues who honestly thought that such draconian violations of long-cherished values and norms, cloaked in the fictional justification that Columbia had become some kind of antisemitic hotbed, were justified, are now seeing what was for many, if not most of us, the inevitable outcome of such sad labors.

Here, for example, is one colleague, quoted just three days ago in the New York Times:

Dr. Brent Stockwell, the chair of the department of biological sciences, said that threatening research funding was exactly the wrong lever for the Trump administration to pull to fight antisemitism, in part because many Jewish faculty members will lose their jobs if their funding is eliminated. “They just don’t understand that if they wipe out all the Jewish researchers who are doing frontier, cutting-edge research, that will just make things more difficult,” said Dr. Stockwell, who is Jewish. “It’s adding salt into the wound.”

But Brent, my man, oh yes, they do understand. Do they ever. And now, perhaps, so do you. They were never going to stop at critics of Israel. They’re coming for the “good” Jews too; indeed, they have already come—they’ve come today, for you. So we’re all in this together now. And by “we” I mean not only us Jews, but every right-thinking defender of the values this university is supposed to stand for. And we should, and can, regardless of our differences of opinion over Israel, join now in common cause to fight the evil engulfing our students and colleagues.