Bill Ayers

The murders at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, are too hideous to fully grasp. The kids and staff members who were slaughtered, the families whose futures are strewn into a cloud of despair. Too much.

Of course our insane gun laws have to be blamed.

But what else? I have read here many thoughtful and heartfelt discussions on the issues.

Here is my two cents worth:

Yes, it would be good to keep guns out of the hands of mentally disturbed people. But that is an impossible distinction. How disturbed? How insane? Every society has someone who suddenly jumps up and runs around raving and hitting. Without guns lying around everywhere, such melt-downs do not result in mass murder.

I happen to think anyone who commits murder is insane, by definition. So how to find that person ahead of time? Not likely.

More importantly, maybe there is a distinction that must be made. When a young kid, often a Black or Brown kid, shoots someone on a city street corner, that young person is insane, or at least “mentally disturbed.” Yes, that person is driven by fear, trauma, anger – and living in a world of deadly economic competition brought on by colonial constriction. We never hear comments after these shootings that the shooter must be mentally disturbed.

But when white, privileged males – at Las Vegas concerts, Sandy Hook elementary, or a Florida high school – let loose with a barrage of AR-15 bullets, it is also insane but framed by an entirely different context. The politicians mark them as pitifully insane. But in my view, such violence is white rage, nurtured by the larger fascist culture, which is daily stoked by Trump and his allies.

It seems ironic, I know. Here are the most privileged people on the planet, 6% of the world’s population consuming 60% of the world’s resources. Yet they manage to nurture a sense of grievance, they paint themselves as victims. It would be pathetic if it weren’t so lethal.

So it is guns, yes, but also white supremacy.

Gun culture has always been tied to slavery and racism. Read Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz’ book Loaded. She points out that the NRA only launched a mad campaign for access to all guns as a result of, and in response to, the powerful Civil Rights and Black Liberation movements of the 60’s and 70’s. Militia culture, paranoid white culture, are all part of white nationalism mixed with toxic masculinity.

We need a counterculture – I don’t mean that in a 60’s sense of the hippie movement (though that might be part of it). We need a counter culture, a culture that is counter to the ridiculous self-pity that white people indulge in and violently lash out through. We need to develop a culture that seeks to give up privilege, that demands that the US not be boss of the world but that is a nation among nations, that places us in harmony with nature and not pillaging her every day for more useless crap to sell and buy, that lives more simply and celebrates when the GDP trends downward, that honors those who were harmed by imperialist violence and pays reparations happily, that defies racist demagogues and seeks to stand in solidarity with the peoples of the world.

Then we can melt down the guns, not only those on the street but those that are bristling in the hands of cops and military, and get on with what people would really like to do in their lives: love each other, grow a little garden, raise our children, repair the roof when it leaks, and sing a song. Wouldn’t that be nice?

https://www.leftwingbooks.net/book/content/looking-us-white-working-class-historically

http://hittingleft.libsyn.com/hitting-left-with-the-klonsky-brothers-52

https://www.semcoop.com/event/crystal-laura-william-ayers-you-cant-fire-bad-ones

http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/teaching_now/2018/02/popular_teacher_myths_is_it_hard_to_fire_the_bad_ones.html

https://www.newyorker.com/humor/borowitz-report/former-hippies-put-in-horrible-position-of-rooting-for-fbi?mbid=social_facebook

Exploding the Myths! At Moe’s in Berkeley next week https://www.facebook.com/events/1514378818669846/

Kirkus Reviews: “You Can’t Fire the Bad Ones!”

A methodical dismantling of the coordinated tenets of the free market assault on public education. Education professors William Ayers (Univ. of Illinois, Chicago; To Teach: The Journey of a Teacher, 2010, etc.), Crystal Laura (Chicago State Univ.; Being Bad: My Baby Brother and the School-to-Prison Pipeline, 2014), and Rick Ayers (Univ. of San Francisco; An Empty Seat in Class: Teaching and Learning after the Death of a Student, 2014, etc.) bring formidable progressive rhetoric to the reform debate. They argue against the conservative refrain that “unruly students, lazy and incompetent teachers, and apathetic administrators together destroy an adequate academic environment.” They view this outlook as specious and so multilayered that it demands a fully structured response. Consequently, they debunk 19 “myths” contributing to this free-wheeling scorn toward public education. The authors touch on many aspects of this discussion, including controversies around charter schools, privatization initiatives, and inequitable allocation of resources. In each chapter, the authors point out the slick bombast of figures like Michelle Rhee and Donald Trump—e.g., the assertion of “the disastrous consequences of allowing the teachers’ unions and their special interest bosses to hold sway over future generations.” They rebut these conceits with a “Reality Check,” evidence-based narratives contradicting each purported reactionary viewpoint. It’s an effective approach, as when they argue that high-pressure standardized testing does not give education a high-priced corporatized sheen but confers advantages to the privileged and amplifies stress for all students. Furthermore, the myth that “Good Teaching is Entirely Color-Blind” is alluring because it “fails to take aim at the institutional and societal structures of privilege and oppression based on race.” The authors also attack the pernicious idea that “Teachers Have It Easy” by explaining how experienced, compassionate instructors “are being driven out of the profession in record numbers.” The authors render their arguments with strong rhetoric, but in emphasizing multicultural awareness and unorthodox teaching methods as solutions, they may not sway the mainstream conservatives whose views they ably counter. A valuable compendium of responses to the shallow, classist hostility to public education.