Theater of the Grotesque

The State of the Union is not good:


  • The United States pours  $720 million a day into the furnace of war in Iraq — — that’s enough to pay for 12,000 new teachers or 35,000 scholarships to four-year colleges or the construction of 84 new elementary schools every day.


  • As the only economically advanced country on earth that fails to guarantee health care to its citizens, the United States has created a system controlled by massive for-profit insurance corporations and giant pharmaceuticals, simultaneously delivering the best medical interventions possible to the fortunate few and a descending level of care down the economic ladder, impoverishing middle income people who have the misfortune of falling ill and leaving millions with no insurance at all and little access to the most basic care — a system where getting a joint replacement is the expected standard for some, while dying from an abscessed tooth is a routine possibility for others, a system that can transplant a heart but doesn’t have a heart.


  • The income gap between white and black families is greater now than it was 40 years ago, and the gap between the richest and the poorest Americans is huge and accelerating.


  • Mass incarceration — over 2.1 million of our fellow citizens are caged in America — and widespread disenfranchisement have become normalized and expected in this country.  For example, a third of black men living in Alabama are disenfranchised and civically dead because of a drug conviction.



The picture is grim: Empire resurrected in the name of a renewed and powerful jingoistic nationalism; war without end; identification of opaque and ill-defined enemies as a unifying cause; unprecedented and unapologetic military expansion and militarism of the entire society; white supremacy essentially intact and unyielding; the entangling of religion with government; the shredding of constitutional rights, the casual disregard for human rights, and the systemic hollowing out of democracy; corporate power unchecked and the ideology of the market promoted as the only true expression of democracy; fraudulent elections; a steady drumbeat of public secrets — obvious lies issued by the powerful, like “we don’t torture,” whose purpose is both future deniability as well as evidence of power’s ability to have its way regardless of law or popular will; disdain for the arts and for intellectual life; the creation of popular movements based on bigotry, intolerance and the threat of violence, and the scapegoating of certain targeted and vulnerable groups.  On a world scale dislocations and imbalances are endemic: 1% of the world’s richest people own 40% of the wealth while 50% of the world’s population controls only 10%. This is a recipe for continued violence and war and ongoing disaster, and while it may not be the whole story, it is without a doubt a bright thread that is both recognizable and knowable.


Now let’s take a trip through the looking glass to the upside down world of George Bush.  In an address that sounded as if it had been crafted in some dark cubicle in the cellar of the Heritage Foundation, President Bush delivered a faith-based, fact-free speech rich in reactionary ideology but completely disconnected from the world we live in.  The economy is fundamentally sound, we were told, peace is at hand, democracy is on the march, we’re the greatest country on earth.  I was reminded of the legendary I. F. Stone’s fundamental principle as a reporter: assume that all governments lie most of the time.  If you start there, you are at least forewarned as you struggle to get your bearings and figure out what’s actually going on.


But most of us don’t start there.  We are too trusting, too credulous, too easily seduced into discussions set up with so that the conclusions are inevitable.  Take the “war on terror.”  The term is a metaphor constructed in the aftermath of the terrible crimes of September 11, but it wasn’t an inevitable choice.  A different metaphor — a criminal justice metaphor, say – might have led to a different conclusion; after all if there’s a killing in Chicago, the cops question witnesses, gather evidence, pursue leads, focus energy and activity on finding the perpetrator.  Perhaps the “war on terror” like “the war on poverty” or the “war on drugs” appealed simply because the rhetoric seems to stand for an all-out effort or a serious undertaking.  But here the metaphor is brought to life through full-scale military invasions in Afghanistan to Iraq.  The metaphoric bind is this: “the war on terror” can’t be won because it’s being fought against a tactic, perhaps a state of mind; the real wars in real countries are hard to stop because “the war on terror” is ongoing — it’s a war that is everywhere and nowhere at once, a war whose conclusion no one can describe with any confidence.  As soon as we begin to discuss “the war on terror” we are trapped in a lie.


Or take health care: if the controlling metaphor is that health care is a product much like a television set, then our current system makes some sense — it taps into deeply held cultural beliefs about individual responsibility and choice and cost.  But if the analogy shifts, if health care begins to be discussed more and more widely as a universal human right, like the right to an education or to public safety, then other deeply held beliefs — about fairness and shared community responsibility — move to the front.


President Bush styles himself the education president, and touts his attachment to standards and accountability, to trusting students to learn, to empowering parents to make choices, and to introducing market metaphors in the discussion of public schools.  Here again he has proven himself the master of the metaphoric battle — enter his framing of the discussion about standards and accountability and feel the ground shift, the slippery slope toward privatization just ahead — but his efforts have been a catastrophe for students and families and teachers in schools.  His overall grade is an “F.”


A basic tenet of democracy, as W.E.B DuBois argued, is that the ultimate authority on any individual’s hurt or desire is the individual himself or herself.  Education in a democracy demands equity, access, and an acknowledgment of the humanity of each person.  The job of schools is to stimulate latent interests, desires, and dreams that cause people to question, to challenge, to criticize, and to act.  Obedience and conformity are enemies of democracy; initiative and courage are its hallmarks.


The right wing attack on public education has taken many forms: an unhealthy obsession with standardized tests as a measure of intelligence and accomplishment; the elevation of zero tolerance as a cultural weapon used to sort students into winners and losers; and the widespread use of the market metaphor to judge school effectiveness.  This campaign never raises the issue of fair funding, of equal access, of generous pay for teachers, of rebuilding dilapidated schools, of encouraging students to ask their own questions in pursuit of their own goals.  It’s a campaign aimed at destroying public schools.


The State of the Union address was a theater of the grotesque; a long line of marionettes on a string, jerked periodically from their seats, heads bobbing, faces twisted into perverse smiles, hands clapping, while the Marine chant – hoo-AH, hoo-AH– pierced the air.  It was mesmerizing.  The death march on display.

6 Responses to Theater of the Grotesque

  1. Steve Pogact says:

    1. re: Universal Health Care and reactionary right wing morons.

    Every talk radio host on the right spends hours each week railing against “socialized medicine” while expounding on the benefits of “market driven health insurance.” Funny how none of them have the guts to take their argument through to its logical conclusion: privatized police protection only for those who can afford it, and local fire departments requiring callers to provide a Visa card prior to dispatching the trucks.

    If protection from crime and fire are basic social benefits that allow us to bend the rules that normally prohibit ‘socialism,’ why is health care any different?

    2. re: the income gap

    When I was a kid growing up in the early 1960s, the two highest paid ballplayers were Mickey Mantle and Willie Mays; each earning the princely sum of $100,000 per year for playing baseball. At the same time, my father was the typical blue collar worker, earning $10,000 per year as a butcher. He purchased a succession of ever larger and nicer suburban single family homes in northern New Jersey and sent three children to private colleges. A couple of vacations every year and a new car every few years, with only a single paycheck for the family. Middle aged meat cutter with 20 years experience now earn between $40,000 and $60,000 per year, IF they are lucky enough to belong to a union or work for a great company. Let’s use an average of $50,000. Meanwhile, ballplayers earning $20 MILLION per year are commonplace

    So, in forty years, normal wages have quintupled, while celebrities have seen salaries increase TWO HUNDRED times! When you look at non-skilled labor, the gap is even larger. There is NO way for a typical blue collar worker to support a family of five in the level of comfort we enjoyed; even if both spouses work, the family will never enjoy the lifestyle we experienced. Does that sound like progress? And a non-progressive ‘flat tax’ based on consumption will only make things worse. Remember, the top income tax during the fabled fifties (the era that Republicans remember so fondly) was 91%. That’s not a typo – it was ninety-one percent!

  2. bill says:

    Wow – your web site must be getting lots of traffic. I thought a stone cold killer like you would get a little more attention than this. Pity.

  3. nason says:

    You’re one to talk. Someone who set bombs to kill, mame, damage innocents – lecturing us on “the furnace of war.”

  4. Sil Maiorana says:

    Mr. Ayers is either a communist or an anarchist – I can’t decide. Universal health care, reduce the income gap for all Americans, free all the incarcerated. Ironic how the FBI “survellience” resulted in unwarranted freedom for this terrorist. In Ayers ideal world, the commie regime would have strung him up. Now he runs free to “educate” future liberal terrorists. He’s right, what a great country!

  5. James Jancik says:

    For the tally books, and not condoning the bombing action, no one was killed in any of the Weathermen bombings. In fact, to my knowledge the only casualties were amongst themselves.

    The targets were not coffee shops, schools nor libraries… It was the institutions on the government that was perpetuating oppression… their “enemy”.

    In reality, they had a better, safer and more conscientious hit against the enemy rate vs innocent hurt/damages then the Police in this country or the Armed Forces over seas.

  6. priscilla says:

    Hi Biil,
    Its been a long time, I hope all is well.

    Take Care

Leave a Reply to Sil Maiorana Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: